Tuesday, September 18, 2012
U.S. – Rivalry between Political and Military Elites: Overthrow At Hand?
Note: this is speculative, but matches some rumors I am hearing, Ben Fulford has been hinting at similar rumblings from intelligence sources. -AK
http://sgtreport.com/2012/09/u-s-rivalry-between-political-and-military-elites-overthrow-at-hand/
U.S. – Rivalry between Political and Military Elites: Overthrow At Hand?
by Zaheerul Hassan, Pakalertpress.com:
American Generals have the intentions of overthrowing Obama before U.S. elections, reliable Americans and Westerns sources disclosed in Washington on the promise of anonymity to the representative of Kremlin news agency. The report reveals that serious differences have been noticed between Pentagon, Whitehouse and CIA over Obama’s economic policies, exit strategy of Afghanistan, Iranian nuclear programme, unwarranted interferences in Middle East countries, supporting Israel and India against Arabs, China and Pakistan.
In fact, political set up mainly “Opposition and Pentagon” demanding disengagement of troops from the war zones since continue out of land’s deployment is severally demoralizing the forces and causing horrible effects on America’s economy. According the defence analysts, American economy continues racing towards financial oblivion, because of its military forces occupying nearly the entire planet. The reliable and closest estimates are showing 60,000 US special operations forces are now conducting assassinations, night-raids, training missions, joint operations and exercises in 120 countries around the world, twice as many as when Obama came to power, with deployments in about 70 countries at any given time. In addition to its overt deployment, she is maintaining the global CIA intelligence network.
CIA after the death of Osama bin Ladin, is enjoying special status in the president’s circle. The differences in CIA and Pentagon have become worsened when political elite suggested the withdrawal of forces but contrary to it, CIA proposed to Obama for taking decision of establishing bases before saying permanently goodbye to Afghanistan.
Read More @ Pakalertpress.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

So Obama is bad now? So what is it then? Obama good or bad? Is he held hostage by the cabal or part of the cabal?
ReplyDeleteIs the Pentagon good or bad? The CIA? Any of them?
Is anything going to happen? I guess not, or perhaps so. Whatever.
I have never taken a stand on whether Obama is good or bad. I simply don't know. Every human makes their own choices.
DeleteCongrats AK for the stand you have re Obama~, I feel the same toward him and anyone else. At the end we need to take only responsibility for what WE (each of us) is doing...
DeleteNAMASTE
SiNeh~
The only thing that I thought was positive about Obama was his foot dragging on Syria and Iran. I don't believe Obama really has much to say about anything regarding policy, but I do suspect that he and a close group of advisers have been slow to engage as best as they can, for what reason I know not (positive, negative, or just a completely different agenda.)
ReplyDeleteI've also felt a disturbance in the "jelly" (the force, what have you... it's palpable, tangible, whatever...) that the neo-conservatives are at least attempting to stir up the fear pot, and their hands in this anti-Islam trailer-without-a-movie-made-by-a-convicted-fraudster is really gumming up the works. Google refuses to remove it, although Google has a long history of removing videos the government deems offensive.
The powers that were are stirring up a pot of distractions to attempt to hold onto power. Whatever forces are holding back this powderkeg are doing a commendable job. Seems just about every false flag attempt is falling flat, and part of that is people awakening and doing their job and not jumping to fear, but rather quickly shooting down the attempts to control by fear.
The timing is a little strange (before the election). We can only infer that the military assumes Obama will be re-elected, that Romney is unelectable due to forthcoming revelations of tax fraud or whatever, or that the democratic process whereby we elect our leaders is compromised. Otherwise, they would respect the constitution they have sworn to uphold, and wait until the elections to gauge the will of the people. We might write in Ron Paul or Judge Napolitano, for example. And, it is also a little strange that they would announce it first to the Russians. As buddy/buddy as they are with Obama, it looks like that would be giving him a heads up! No, if our military truly feels that we are in danger from within, they owe it to the American people to tell them first and allow the American people to occupy America in strength. Patrimony, even if well-intentioned, is a vote of no-confidence in the American people, and subverts the constitution upon which this country was founded.
ReplyDelete