Thursday, October 25, 2012

There Was No Quorum In The Creating The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and The Income Tax Reforms Act


http://nesaranews.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/the-government-has-now-conceded.html

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOW CONCEDED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF THE INVALIDITY OF TITLE 18!!

The foundation argument made is based on "no Constitutional" passage due to a lack of a quorum.  There was no quorum in the creating the Federal Reserve act of 1913 either and the Income Tax Reforms Act, created the IRS, was never ratified.  The following is the crack in the dam of the US corporation.  This argument is valid in many other areas of unconstitutionality.


THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOW CONCEDED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE  OF THE INVALIDITY OF TITLE 18!!

UPDATE ON TITLE 18 CLASS ACTION

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2012

September 27, 2012

A Motion for Summary Judgment was docketed by the Court of Appeals for the District of  Columbia Circuit Court, requesting immediate relief for anyone on the petition.

The Motion is based on the un-refuted affidavits and proof that no Constitutional passage occurred for Title 18, the criminal code in the 80th Congress (1947-1948).

Since the Title also includes the only authorization to allow federal courts jurisdiction in any  criminal case, whether Title 18, Title 21, or Title 26, 18 USC section 3231, then the motion requests relief for each person on the petition.

You have a limited amount of time to get on the petition.


Contact us immediately!

In a challenge to the Validity of Title 18 (Public Law 80-772), the government has now admitted that Public Law 80-772 is unconstitutional. These admissions can be used in the Class Action on Title 18 and in other federal criminal cases.

The original class action petition was filed in the DC court on 2/23/2012. The judge refused to rule on the merits or make findings of fact and conclusions of law and now it is on appeal. An opening brief, a reply brief, and a Motion for Summary Judgment have been filed by our group. The government has waived argument on the issues presented.

A verified request for proof of claim was filed in a separate case on August 27, 2012 by our group. 18 stipulated answers were provided, to which the government waived argument on all stipulations, thus admitting the stipulations.

Included in those admissions were that “no quorum existed on May 12, 1947 and June 22 and 23, 1948”, rendering 18 USC section 3231, which is the only statute which gives the district court jurisdiction to prosecute any federal crime, invalid.

The government also admitted that the quorum issue has never been heard on the merits; that no Supreme Court precedent exists for the government; and that the US attorney is violating the law by prosecuting any crime.

The government also admitted that no prior statute gives the federal courts jurisdiction; that the indictment is void on any federal criminal case; that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation; and that pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), the government was required to answer the proof of claims.

Since the government violated the APA, then their silence can only be equated with fraud. See U.S. v. Pruden, 424 F.2d 1021 (1970). Under the authority of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC section 556(D)-Burden of Proof, “the proponent of a rule or order bears the burden of proof.” The Supreme Court has stated that “if any tribunal (court) finds absences of proof of jurisdiction over person or subject matter, that case must be dismissed.” Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Motley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908).

The Attorney General was given 3 opportunities to respond to affidavits of fact and a request for a certified question of law related to the invalidity of Title 18. No response was made. In U.S. v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981), the court held: “Indeed, no more than that, [Affidavits], is necessary to make the prima facie case.” Id at 536. “Moreover the threshold of relevance is a low one.” Id at 537. “The burden is therefore on the Respondent who must come forward with special facts to support a legally sufficient rebuttal or defense.” Id at 538-39. The stipulated answers are now admitted.

Included in the stipulated facts the government has now admitted are:
  1. An internal memorandum by Harley G. Lappin to Department Heads of the Bureau of Prisons on July 27, 2009 in which he states that “In order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show that iw was passed in the presence of a Quorum. See United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). The Clerk of the House states that the May 12, 1947 vote was a ‘voice vote,’ but the Parliamentarian of the House states that a voice vote is only valid when the Journal shows that a quorum is present and that it’s unlawful for the Speaker of the House to sign any enrolled bill in the absence of a quorum. On May 12, 1947, a presence of 218 Members in the hall of the House was required to be entered on the Journal in order for the 44 Member 38 to 6 voice vote to be legal.”

  2. A letter from Jeff Trandahl, clerk of the House to Mr. Charles R. Degan dated June 28, 2000, in which he states: “Congress was in session on June 1,3,4,7-12 and 14-19, 1948, however Title 18 was not voted on at this time.

  3. A letter from Karen L. Haas, clerk of the House, dated September 11, 2008, in which she stated: “After conducting a thorough examination of the journals, I found no entry in the journal of the House of any May 12, 1947 vote on the H.R. 3190 bill…”

  4. A letter by Nancy Erickson to Mr. Wayne E. Matthews dated March 9, 2009 in which she stated that “I asked the Senate Historian’s office to review the correspondence you enclosed, and they were able to verify that no action was taken by the Senate on H.R. 3190 prior to the December 19, 1947 sine die adjournment.

  5. A letter dated August 24, 2010 from the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives which stated: “Our office has conducted research of the House Journal and the Congressional Record in regards to HR 3190 and the voice vote that was taken on May 12, 1947. After researching these official proceedings of the US House of Representatives we have been unable to find the names of the 44 Members who responded to the voice vote.

  6. Pursuant to their oath of office, the courts are required to follow the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent.
Contact Martin Michaelsson: MM@YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com.
Brought to you by....
www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com

14 comments:

  1. Well I kind of understand this legality but im not a legal expert. Can you break this down so the average joe can interpret this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I understand it(as a fellow regular Jane) is that:

      The banks were made against the will of the people, and this means that congress did not ratify it, and with only the president signing it(executive orders are not to be used in this way, especially in 1947), that means both forces are negated and are operating illegally, much like a shell corporation or what Romney did with "Bain Capital"(the second one, the shadow company with gangs, drugs and killing).

      From what I can piece together, the issue is not so much that they exist, but rather HOW they came into existence.

      Did I get that right AK? I'm not a paralegal...I'm just a designer trying to whittle it down so it makes sense.

      Delete
  2. So, has any information come out on how to join the petition? Has that time already passed?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Holy guacemole!

    This is news! Whoa....

    It's another example of the changes happening one by one right under our noses.

    Nice post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would love for this to be true....But, I googled the domain names and contactee info related to this article....It seems many many people have been scammed by this group...

    couple links to stories from victims:
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/loan-modification/michael-lawrence/michael-lawrence-michael-lawre-16a2e.htm

    http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=135869

    whois results for yourremedyisinthelaw.com:
    Registrant
    Most Affordable Marketing
    c/o 1543 Old Daytona Court
    DeLand, FL 32720
    US
    386-804-1234
    Fax:800-625-4250
    Domain Name: YOURREMEDYISINTHELAW.COM
    Administrative Contact:
    Keith, Michael-Edward TheeScotsman@gMail.com
    c/o 1543 Old Daytona Court
    DeLand, FL 32720
    US
    386-804-1234
    Fax:800-625-4250
    Technical Contact:
    Keith, Michael-Edward TheeScotsman@gMail.com
    c/o 1543 Old Daytona Court
    DeLand, FL 32720
    US
    386-804-1234
    Fax:800-625-4250
    Record last updated 01-11-2012 10:47:35 PM
    Record expires on 07-27-2013
    Record created on 07-26-2005
    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS5.RKFRANTZ.COM 74.211.238.80
    NS6.RKFRANTZ.COM 74.211.192.50

    Reverse Whois: "Most Affordable Marketing" owns about253 other domains
    Email Search: TheeScotsman@gMail.com is associated with about 269 domains

    link to list of 44 domains that share the same ip address:http://spyonweb.com/www.yourremedyisinthelaw.com

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mike,
      We need more people who expose the truth as most blogs are being targeted with disinfo so that the benevolent cabal can sweep in and start their licensing controled info act just like radio and tv.

      Delete
    2. I do not know if this site is a scam but the info is correct.
      watch America: Freedom to Fascism and do your own research. you will be shocked and I promise you, definitely pissed.

      Delete
    3. yea, its gettin more difficult every day trying to wade through all the disinfo coming out at this time =|

      and yes America: Freedom to Fascism is a great documentary! Im not questioning the info contained in this article or the info in the documentary, but I AM calling shenanigans on this particular group of people who are assosiated with the above article.

      Before you sign up for their class action law suit, just be sure and do some research before hand... far as i understand the firms that do these suits do not ask for moneies up front.

      **please note i didnt look into http://nesaranews.blogspot.com.au, i doubt they have anything to do with the scammers.

      Mike

      Delete
  5. Thanks Michael for the work. I hope you don't get attacked for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They are illegal, thereby have no right to operate should/must be terminated immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ok, so they are scammers---but can anyone speak to the accuracy of the question regarding the conception of the Fed and this element of a non-existent quorum?

    ReplyDelete
  8. And by 'they', I mean 'yourremedyisinthelaw', et al...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Look into David Wilcock

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey all,

    I contacted the original law firm that filed the suit and was told that the Supreme court dismissed the case without hearing, so not sure how this can stand???

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.