Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Chained to the Wall



It's not like we haven't been warned about this.  Plato's Cave tells our story.  Bill Hicks spoke about it.  George Carlin joked about it.  David Icke warns us about it still.  About five years ago, Dream Hopper had the following dream which is a foreshadowing of now.


He lived in a place where everything was available to him.  Life was pretty straightforward.  There wasn't much to do, but it wasn't necessarily painful or difficult either. Yet, everyone was shackled.  Now these chains were long.  He could move around freely and do pretty much anything he could think of.  People chose where their chain was worn, the ankle, the wrist, the waist, the neck.  These chains were not locked.  But they were worn by everyone.  

Every once in awhile it would occur to someone that "there must be something better than this."  They would unhook their chain and go out the door.  This had been going on for quite some time and there were stories about the result.  Going out the door was risky and always ended in some sort of destruction for the one who did it.

Sometimes people didn't come back.  The ones who did had horrible stories, to include losing tons of money, falling off the grid, not being able to get anything going and being worn out bodily, mentally, emotionally and spiritually.  They just couldn't do it anymore.  They believed the others, the ones who had never come back, must have met some untimely end.

DH unhooks himself and goes out the door.  He struggles and finds himself out of money and out of time.  He does notice while this is going on, that those who hadn't returned were not dead.  They seemed to have figured it out.  They were doing okay.

He, however, was not.  He couldn't figure it out.  He went back and re-attached his chain.  He gave in to the strong desire for it to be easier.  

Time passed and again, he grew tired of the chain.  He left, this time with a new strategy.  He decided to get to know the successful ones.  He would learn from them.

He noticed what they did.  They did not negotiate with the "owners of the room" he had been chained in.  They just did not deal with them at all.  The only way to not be a part of that system was to just not be a part of that system.

He tried it their way.  He only dealt with and negotiated with people who were successful.  He did not deal with those "in charge of the room". Once he started doing that, he became successful.  It wasn't instant but it worked.

Excited with his discovery, he ran back to the room, threw open the door and said "You don't have to be in here! There is another way to do this!  Come on!".

Nobody moved.

He said it again.

Mostly no one responded.

So he left.  He woke up before hearing the end of their stories. 

We are in new territory.  Our chains have been removed for us with the UCC filings of the One People's Public Trust.  It is upon us now to Be.  Be Free.  This will take bravery, tenacity and belief.  We are challenging all that we have ever known.  It is up to us to go out the door first, and then return and tell the others. 

No one is going to open the door or separate us from our chains.  We have to do that ourselves, each of us, in our own way.  Freedom isn't something that is granted to you, freedom is something that you take.  It is something that you know.  It is truth.

Free is what you are.  Love is who you are.  Understand the truth of what has happened with the One People's Public Trust and then return and tell the others.  This is why you are here and the moment is upon you right now.  We are the One's we've been waiting for.
~Sophia


Portal 2012: Cobra Interview


http://2012portal.blogspot.ca/

Cobra Interview on ET-First Contact Radio

You might want to listen to this new interview:



Enjoy!

OPPT: Government Corporation List

OPPT: Declaration and Order - Arrest Order

A MASSIVE Bearish Bet Against Banks Has Traders Buzzing

cassicat / Flickr

http://www.businessinsider.com/massive-options-bet-against-bank-etf-2013-2

A MASSIVE Bearish Bet Against Banks Has Traders Buzzing
Matthew Boesler

 Feb. 6, 2013, 2:51 PM

According to Barron's columnist Steven Sears, someone made a big bet against the financials ETF yesterday (ticker symbol XLF), and it has everybody buzzing.

The trader bought 100,000 put options on the ETF (a put option increases in value when the price of the underlying asset, in this case, the ETF, goes down).

To put that number in perspective, Sears writes, "Few investors ever trade more than 500 contracts, so a 100,000 order tends to stop traffic and prompt all sorts of speculation about what's motivating the trade." According to Sears, the trade "has sparked conversations across the market."

The trade makes money if the ETF drops below $16. It's trading just north of $17.50 today.
While the bet has everyone scratching their heads, Sears offers one possible explanation: bank stocks have been on a tear lately, so it make sense for someone who own bank stocks to hedge against a reversal by purchasing put options on the ETF that tracks bank stocks.

However, Sears says a trader trying to hedge against a short-term reversal didn't need to set up the trade this way:

To be sure, it makes perfect sense to hedge a hot fund like the financial sector SPDR. The fund has surged this year, and gained about 7.2%. But if the mystery hedger was simply concerned the financial sector exchange-traded fund would retreat from its 52-week high of 17.66, which is reasonable, there are shorter-term hedges. For instance, he could have bought puts that expire no later than March, because they would be more sensitive to near-term changes.

By choosing April puts, the mystery investor has some traders concerned that they, along with the majority of investors, are too optimistic ahead of the coming budget fight.
Read the rest at Barrons.com >

Interestingly, Art Cashin alerted readers of his daily note to a similarly large and bearish but separate trade this morning. Read about it here >


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/massive-options-bet-against-bank-etf-2013-2

Ben Fulford: Reader Asks about Illuminati Structure




02/06/2013

Hi,I'm a male 40- year old Kenyan who's been a follower ever since your Fukushima expose. I have some questions I've always wanted to ask to simplify things. Is there a single high command at the pyramid apex or is there not a single Illuminati monolith? If not, which are the main factions and their specific agendas if any? Is there a single geographical region for each faction like an agreed sphere of influence?

Are any of these factions ever at loggerheads even though they share the same underlying philosophy of elitism, inbreeding, satanism(?) and contempt for Man? There are many threads on the illuminati and I've looked long for a functional description but haven't seen one.

Rgds

Thank you for the very thought provoking question. It will require a long answer. First of all, I believe that for most people the word Illuminati has become a generic term for a secret elite manipulating world events.

The reality is more complicated. Two groups have contacted me, each claiming to be the Illuminati. One says they have been opposed to secret rule by Satanic bloodlines for thousands of years. They claim to have started the French, Russian and American revolutions. Another group calling itself Illuminati says they are descended from the Caesars of Rome and control the Vatican and the Mafia. They are better known as the Vatican P2 lodge. Together they were plotting a fascist world government known as the New World Order. They were opposed by the inbred Royal families of Europe who I think of as the Old World Order.

Until recently, there was unified leadership with 5 key people at the top: David Rockefeller, George Bush Sr., Evelyn Rothschild, Queen Elizabeth and the Pope. Around the time of the election of George Bush Jr. and the self-inflicted 911, 2001 terror attack, they split into two factions: the war on terror faction and the global warming faction. The war on terror faction was the New World Order and the Global warming faction was the Old World Order.

Recently, my contacts with people at or near the top of the Western power structure lead me to believe the real situation has become really complicated because of a power transition. A good parallel is a band of hyenas that has lost its alpha leader. For a while there is complex factional infighting going on and it is hard to figure out exactly what is going on.

That is because an Asian group decided Western leadership was destroying the planet and started to take on both factions. They have done very well and the result has been the 180 nation BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) alliance.

President Obama was very limited in what he could do during his first term because of the power of the two secret factions. He was set up to be a puppet who could fool the colored peoples of the world into thinking he was the world’s leader and not the old white men like George Soros, David Rockefeller and George Bush Sr. who were pulling his strings.

Recently though, the situation has changed. My sources tell me the Rockefellers have fled to an Island near Fiji the Bushes tried to flee to South America but were stopped. Obama is now free to do more than he could in his first term. However, an American president has to represent the consensus of the establishment, especially the military industrial complex, so Obama is still fairly powerless.

Another way to understand what is going on in the West it to realize it has a split personality. One part of the West thinks of itself as heir to Greek (science and democracy) and Roman (law and strong military power) culture. However, a large part of the elite think of themselves as heirs to Babylonian or Egyptian cultures which were ruled by God kings. It is the Babylonian and Egyptian traditions that are associated with occult secret societies, slavery, finance, guilds and Satanism.

Memo justifies drone kills even with patchy intelligence


Memo justifies drone kills even with patchy intelligence

WASHINGTON | Tue Feb 5, 2013 2:42pm EST

(Reuters) - The government has authorized the killing of American citizens as part of its controversial drone campaign against al Qaeda even without intelligence that such Americans are actively plotting to attack a U.S. target, according to a Justice Department memo.

The unclassified memo, first obtained by NBC News, argues that drone strikes are justified under American law if a targeted U.S. citizen had "recently" been involved in "activities" posing a possible threat and provided that there is no evidence suggesting the individual "renounced or abandoned" such activities.

The document was disclosed as a bipartisan group of U.S. senators called on the Obama administration to release to Congress "any and all" legal opinions laying out the government's understanding of what legal powers the president has to deliberately kill American citizens.
This blog is supported by ads and donations. If you enjoy this blog please consider supporting it with a contribution via PayPal.